CMA5005 – Research Methods in the Built Environment Assignment help

CMA5005 – Research Methods in the Built Environment is a course designed to equip students with essential research skills relevant to the built environment field. This assignment typically focuses on various methodologies, data collection techniques, and analytical approaches pertinent to architectural, urban, and environmental studies. In this assignment, students may be required to: Understand Research Methodologies: Explore qualitative and quantitative research methods, including surveys, case studies, interviews, and observational techniques. Develop Research Proposals: Create a detailed proposal outlining research questions, objectives, literature reviews, and proposed methodologies. Data Analysis: Analyze collected data using appropriate statistical or thematic analysis tools, demonstrating how to interpret findings in the context of the built environment. Ethical Considerations: Address ethical issues related to conducting research in public and private spaces, particularly regarding consent and data protection. Application to Real-World Problems: Relate research methods to real-world challenges in architecture, urban planning, sustainability, or policy-making. To succeed in this assignment, students should demonstrate critical thinking, the ability to synthesize information, and a clear understanding of how to apply research findings to inform practice in the built environment. If you need more specific guidance or help with particular aspects of the assignment, feel free to ask! Module Code and Name CMA5005 – Research Methods in Construction and the Built Environment Module Leader IfeOluwa Adejuyigbe, PhD Cohort February 2022 Level Level 5 Assessment component(s) Component 1: Report Component 2: Research Proposal + Ethics Form Restrictions on time/word count Component 1: Report (2000 words) Component 2: Research Proposal (3000 words) + Ethics Form Individual/group Component 1: Individual Report Submission Component 2: Individual Research Proposal Submission + Ethics Form Assessment weighting(s) Component 1: Report (2000 words) = 50% Component 2: Research Proposal (3000 words) = 50% Formative Submission Hand-in date: 500-word formative submission Deadline: 21st October, 2024 before 23:59 Hand in date(s) Component 1: 2000-word Report Deadline: 28th October 2024, before 23:59 Component 2: 3000-word Research Proposal Deadline: 4th November 2024, before 23:59 Please note: GBS grades your assessment anonymously, so you do not need to include a TITLE PAGE TO YOUR REPORT. PLEASE DO NOT INCLUDE ANY PERSONAL INFORMATION SUCH AS YOUR NAME, GBS ID AND BSU ID IN YOUR REPORT. THE FIRST PAGE OF YOUR REPORT SHOULD BE YOUR TABLE OF CONTENTS. Assessment Component(s) - Summary Formative 500 Overview: You are required to write 500 word on Personal Development Objectives and Self-assessment, Reflection and Evidence of Development. Component 1: Report Overview: You are required to submit a Self-development and Critical Reflection Report in 2,000 words discussing how the study of the course had influenced your development x-raying where you were at the start of this course and using it to show what you have achieved over the time of your study. Component 2: Research Proposal + Ethics Form Overview: You are required to submit a Research Proposal identifying a suitable topic for Academic Research in 3,000 words discussing a specific area or issue of interest in construction management and in construction at large. Also fill the attached Ethics Form located on Moodle at the Study Skills page or attached to this document and attach to your proposal. Assessment Component(s) – Detailed Instructions COMPONENT 1 (REPORT): Additional information/guidance: 1. Introduction (250 words) Introduce the report’s objective. Briefly explain the context of your self-development, such as a course, training program, or personal initiative. Outline the specific goals you aimed to achieve through this self-development process. 2. Personal Development Objectives (250 words) Define and elaborate on your self-development objectives. Describe the specific skills, knowledge, or attitudes you intended to develop. Explain why these objectives were important to you. 3. Self-assessment, Reflection and Evidence of Development (500 words) Explain the framework or model you used for reflection. Critically assess your progress and experiences. Describe specific experiences or activities related to your objectives. Evaluate the outcomes of these experiences in relation to your goals. Identify any challenges or obstacles you faced. Reflect on what you learned from these experiences and challenges. Provide evidence to support your reflections. Include examples such as feedback, assessments, certificates, work samples, or any other relevant documentation. Highlight key achievements or milestones. 4. Analysis of Skills, Competencies, Personal Impact and Insights (500 words) Analyze how your skills and competencies have evolved. Discuss specific skills that have improved. Identify any new skills you have acquired. Relate your development to broader competencies and frameworks (e.g., professional standards). Reflect on the personal impact of your development. Describe any changes in your attitudes or mindsets. Identify any changes in your behavior or habits. Share significant insights or realizations gained through the process. 5. Future Development Plan (250 words) Outline your plan for ongoing development. Describe how you plan to continue developing your skills and knowledge. Set new development objectives based on your reflections. Provide a concrete action plan with steps, timelines, and resources needed. 6. Conclusion (250 words) Summarize your reflection and development. Recap the most important insights and achievements. Reflect on the overall impact of the self-development process on your personal and professional life. 10. References Cite any sources or literature you referenced. Follow a consistent citation style (Harvard Referencing) to list all references. Additional Tips for Writing: Authenticity in your reflections will make your report more meaningful. Provide detailed examples and evidence to support your reflections. Follow a clear and logical structure to ensure your report is coherent and easy to follow. Use phrases like “I learned that…”, “This experience taught me…”, “I realized…”, etc. Review your report for clarity, grammar, and spelling errors. COMPONENT 2 (RESEARCH PROPOSAL): Additional information/guidance: 1. Title Clearly state the research topic. The title should be concise and descriptive, providing a clear indication of the research focus. 2. Introduction (300 Words) Introduce the research topic and its significance. Provide context and background information on the topic. Clearly state the research problem or question you aim to address. Explain the importance of the research and its potential impact. 3. Literature Review (1050 Words) Review existing research related to your topic. Summarize key findings and theories from relevant literature. Identify gaps or limitations in the current knowledge that your research will address. Mention any theories or models that will guide your research. 4. Research Objectives and Questions (300 Words) Define the goals and specific questions of your research. List the main objectives of your research. Formulate specific research questions or hypotheses that your study aims to answer. 5. Methodology (350 Words) Describe the research design and methods you will use to conduct the study. Specify whether your study is qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods. Explain how you will collect data (e.g., surveys, interviews, experiments). Describe the sample population and sampling methods. Outline the methods you will use to analyze the data. Address any ethical issues related to your research. 6. Timeline and Budget (if applicable) (500 Words) Provide a realistic timeline for completing the research. Break down the research process into phases (e.g., literature review, data collection, analysis). Set specific milestones and deadlines for each phase. Estimate the costs associated with your research. List potential expenses such as materials, travel, and participant incentives. Mention any funding sources or grants you apply for. 7. Expected Outcomes (500 Words) Predict the potential findings and contributions of your research. Describe what you expect to discover or demonstrate through your research. Discuss the potential implications for theory, practice, or further research. 8. References List all the sources cited in your proposal. Follow a consistent citation style (Harvard Style) for your references. ETHICS FORM Fill up the attached Ethics Form on Moodle located in the Study Skill tab or attached below in this document to complete the Research Proposal by attaching it to the end of your proposal, properly filled and should be submitted along with your Research proposal. Additional Tips for Writing: Use clear and concise language to communicate your ideas effectively. Provide detailed information about your research plan and objectives. Ensure that all sections of your proposal are logically connected and support your research goals. Review your proposal for clarity, grammar, and spelling errors. Additional information/guidance: Remember to include in-text citations and a reference list according to Harvard Referencing style. Student must include academic references. Your work will be graded against the references too. Always remember to use headings and subheadings, which form your report table of content. Use any of the following fonts: Arial, Calibri, Sans-Serif or Times New Roman for your text. You are to add relevant images while writing your report to support your discussion. Also, caption the images appropriately as they are also graded in the report structure. You can add an outline for the report too. Use font size 12, with 1.5 or double line spacing. The presentation of the work is also considered. The file format must be Microsoft Word in .doc, .docx, .odt or Pdf, but do not submit in Apple’s Pages format. The limit for the word count is 2000 words +/- 10% for the Report and 3000 words +/- 10% for the Research Proposal. Anything outside the limit may not be assessed. You must reference all sources and information used in the report using the Harvard Referencing Guide in Study Skills Tab. Remember to access the ‘Report Template’ and ‘Research Proposal Template’ via ‘Assessments’ tab on Moodle. Kindly see attached grid for assessment criteria. Assessment criteria/marking rubric (personalise this to your specific module assessment requirements) Component 1: Report Dimensions 70 – 100% (1st) 60 – 69% (2:1) 50 – 59% (2:2) 40 – 49% (3rd) 0 – 39% (Fail) Criterion 1 (20%) Introduction and Personal Development Objectives The introduction is clear, engaging, and provides a thorough understanding of the topic. The purpose of the research/project is well-defined and relevant, showcasing strong insight into the subject matter. Context and background information are detailed and connect logically to the research objectives. The objectives are clearly articulated, specific, measurable, and relevant to both personal and professional growth. The introduction provides a solid understanding of the topic with some insight into its relevance. The purpose is defined, though some areas could benefit from more detail or depth. The objectives are well-stated, but some could be more specific or measurable. The introduction adequately introduces the topic but lacks depth or engagement. The purpose is somewhat clear, but there may be gaps in how it relates to the broader context or research objectives. The objectives are present but may lack specificity or relevance to the research/project. The introduction is vague or lacking in detail, with limited engagement or clarity. The purpose is either not clearly defined or does not align well with the research/project. The objectives are unclear, not well-defined, or do not reflect personal or professional growth. The introduction is poorly written or missing. It fails to define the purpose or relevance of the research/project. The structure is disorganized and lacks coherence. Objectives are absent, unclear, or irrelevant to the research/project. Criterion 2 (30%) Self-assessment, Reflection and Evidence of Development The self-assessment is thorough, insightful, and demonstrates a deep understanding of strengths and areas for improvement. The reflection is highly detailed and demonstrates critical thinking, clearly linking experiences to learning outcomes. Substantial evidence of both personal and professional development is presented, supported by concrete examples. The self-assessment is solid, with good identification of strengths and areas for improvement. The reflection is thoughtful and connects experiences to learning outcomes, though there may be areas lacking depth or critical analysis. Clear evidence of personal and professional development, though some examples could be more specific. The self-assessment is adequate but lacks depth or specificity in identifying strengths and weaknesses. The reflection is present but somewhat superficial, with limited critical thinking or analysis. Evidence of development is present but may be general or lacking in detail. The self-assessment is incomplete or lacks clarity, with minimal identification of strengths or areas for improvement. The reflection is limited, lacking critical analysis or connection between experiences and learning outcomes. Minimal evidence of development, with little connection to the objectives or goals. The self-assessment is missing or extremely poor, showing no identification of strengths, weaknesses, or areas for growth. The reflection is absent or irrelevant, with no attempt to link experiences to learning outcomes or future actions. No evidence of development is presented, or the examples provided are irrelevant or insufficient. Criterion 3 (20%) Analysis of Skills, Competencies, Personal Impact and Insights The analysis is well-supported by specific examples, with clear connections to real-life situations or projects. Evidence of using competencies effectively in practical settings is clear and well-documented. Shows a balanced view of both positive impact and areas for personal improvement. Insights are connected to long-term goals, illustrating how new knowledge or skills will be applied in the future. Examples are used to support the analysis but may lack detail or specificity in certain aspects. There is some evidence of competencies being applied effectively, though examples could be expanded. The analysis reflects an awareness of both positive contributions and areas for improvement, but it could be more comprehensive. There is some connection between experiences and future development, though it may not be fully developed or clearly articulated. There is limited use of specific examples, and the analysis may be superficial in identifying strengths and areas for improvement. Examples of applying competencies may be weak, unclear, or lacking in detail. The analysis acknowledges personal impact but lacks critical evaluation of its significance. Insights are relevant but could be more thoughtful or reflective of broader learning experiences. The analysis of skills is limited or unclear, with little identification of strengths or areas for improvement. Competencies are not linked to practical examples or real-world application. Minimal awareness of both positive contributions and areas for improvement. The reflection lacks any connection to future development or goals. There is no evidence of understanding personal strengths or areas for improvement. No evidence is provided to support the discussion of competencies. There is no awareness of the need for personal improvement. There is no connection between experiences and future development, and no critical thinking is evident. Criterion 4 (20%) Future Development Plan and Conclusion The development plan is highly detailed, realistic, and well-structured, reflecting an in-depth understanding of personal and professional growth. The conclusion is comprehensive, clear, and effectively summarizes the key points of the analysis. The development plan is solid, with clear and realistic goals, although it may lack some depth or specificity in certain areas. The conclusion effectively summarizes the key points and reflects on the overall learning experience.

Looking for unique and playful art prints and greeting cards? Look no further than By Honey Studios! Shop now for high-quality designs perfect for gif...

Don’t rely on hearsay when it comes to choosing a college! Vidyavision features authentic college reviews from current and former students, providi...

If you're looking to become certified in Scrum or Agile Choosing the right certification seller is crucial to your professional development. These cer...

CE Academy is an experienced NEET Academy in Chennai, guiding students to reach their full potential. Our expert instructors and comprehensive curricu...

If you are looking for plastic planters manufacturers in Panchkula, Diplast Plastics is a leading name in the industry. They specialize in producing d...

CMA5005 – Research Methods in the Built Environment is a course designed to equip students with essential research skills relevant to the built envi...